Case Study: Clarifying an Interchangeable Brand Positioning in a Crowded Category
- Katina Ndlovu
- 2 days ago
- 3 min read
Context
This case involved a service-based business operating in a competitive market where many providers appeared visually and verbally similar. The brand was professionally designed and outwardly polished, but struggled to be described succinctly or differentiated meaningfully.
The business was credible, but difficult to explain.
The Core Problem- Interchangeable Brand Positioning
Despite strong fundamentals, the brand blended into its category. A classic case of poor interchangeable brand positioning.
Different audiences described it in different ways, and no single explanation consistently captured what it should be known for.
The brand looked established, but its positioning lacked precision.
Why This Was a Positioning Issue
This was not a design quality problem.
It was a positioning clarity problem.
Visual assets, messaging, and language cues were broadly appealing but insufficiently specific, which caused the brand to feel interchangeable with competitors.
When positioning is over-broad, recognition weakens.
The Approach
The work focused on clarifying meaning rather than creating novelty.
Key actions included:
Identifying the one primary positioning anchor the brand should be known for
Narrowing language that attempted to appeal to too many audiences
Aligning visual and verbal cues with the intended category and scope
Removing signals that contributed to generic or ambiguous interpretation
The goal was recognisability, not reinvention.
What Changed
After clarification, the brand became easier to describe consistently.
Its positioning was more specific, and explanations converged around a single, repeatable idea rather than multiple interpretations.
The brand no longer relied on aesthetics alone to communicate value.
Evidence of Positioning Clarification
The before and after examples show how positioning clarity improved once the homepage headline was narrowed and made more specific.
As illustrated by the headline change:
The original headline relied on broad, location-led language that positioned the business as a general provider within a crowded category
The revised headline introduced clearer expertise signalling, narrowing how the business should be understood
Category meaning shifted from “available in many locations” to “known for a specific service and level of expertise”
Supporting copy reinforced the new positioning rather than competing with it
These changes demonstrate how differentiation improved once positioning was clarified through language rather than design.
Before:
After:
Why This Matters for Brand Design and Positioning
Brands are not differentiated by looking better, but by meaning something clearer.
When positioning is precise, design reinforces recognition rather than compensating for ambiguity.
Where This Pattern Applies
This issue commonly appears in:
Crowded service categories
Brands built to look “professional” without strategic differentiation
Businesses competing on quality but lacking a clear positioning anchor
Relationship to Brand Design and Positioning Work
This case reflects brand design and positioning work focused on narrowing meaning, reinforcing differentiation, and ensuring brands are recognised for what they actually do rather than how polished they appear.
FAQs
What problem does this case study demonstrate?
It demonstrates how brands can appear professional and credible while still being difficult to differentiate when positioning language is too broad.
Is this case study about redesigning a brand?
No. The case focuses on positioning clarity through language and framing, not visual redesign or rebranding.
What specifically changed to improve differentiation?
The homepage headline and supporting messaging were narrowed to introduce a clearer positioning anchor and reduce generic category signalling.
Does this case study show performance or conversion results?
No. It documents changes in clarity and interpretability rather than traffic, conversion, or revenue outcomes.
Who typically experiences this type of positioning issue?
This issue commonly affects service-based businesses in crowded markets where many providers appear visually and verbally similar.
About the Author
Katina Ndlovu works on brand design and positioning at the structural level, focusing on how meaning, differentiation, and expertise are communicated across websites, search engines, and AI systems. Her work centres on narrowing positioning so brands are easier to recognise, describe, and place within their category.
She documents applied work through case studies to show how positioning clarity strengthens brand recognition without relying on surface-level design changes.
If your brand looks polished but feels hard to distinguish or explain, this work focuses on clarifying positioning so your expertise is recognised rather than blended into the category.
You can explore related case studies below or get in touch to discuss how your brand is currently being positioned and interpreted.
Comments